احمدوند، مهری (1389). بررسی ویژگیهای روان‌سنجی پرسشنامه راهبردهای انگیزشی برای یادگیری در دانشجویان دانشگاههای تهران. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
درتاج، فریبرز و افشاریان، ندا (1395). ارزیابی ساختار عاملی پرسشنامۀ راهبردهای انگیزشی برای یادگیری در دانشآموزان ایرانی. فصلنامه اندازهگیری تربیتی، 6(23)، 23-43.
دلاور، علی. (1396). طرحهای آزمایشی در روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی. تهران: سمت.
زاهد، سعیده، درتاج، فریبرز، اسدزاده، حسن، کدیور، پروین و فرخی، نورعلی (1400). ساختار عاملی و اعتباریابی نسخهی فارسی پرسشنامه بار شناختی. فصلنامه روانشناسی شناختی، 9(1)، 32-44.
زاهد، سعیده، کارشکی، حسین و روشنقیاس، پروین. (1402). تأثیر بار شناختی برونزاد بر درگیری شناختی و بار شناختی مطلوب دانشجویان: اثر دشواری مطلوب.
فصلنامه روانشناسی تربیتی، 19(70)، 180-201.
https://doi.org/10.22054/jep.2023.71445.3759
عبدی، علی، و رستمی، مریم (1396). اثربخشی روش آموزش مبتنی بر اثرات بار شناختی بر پیشرفت درسی، بار شناختی ادراک شده و انگیزش دانشآموزان به یادگیری درس علوم تجربی. نشریه علمی- پژوهشی آموزش و ارزشیابی، 10(4)، 43-67.
قدسی، احمد، طالعپسند، سیاوش، رضایی، علیمحمد و محمدیفر، محمدعلی. (1396). ویژگیهای روان‌سنجی مقیاس هزینه تکلیف در دانشآموزان متوسطه دوم شهر قم. فصلنامه اندازهگیری تربیتی، 7(28)، 97-120.
کدیور، پروین. (1400). روانشناسی تربیتی (ویراست 2). تهران: سمت.
Abdi, A., & Rostami, M,. (2018). The Effect of Instruction Based on Cognitive Load theory on Academic Achievement, Perceived Cognitive Load and Motivation to Learning in Science Courses. Instruction and evaluation Quarterly journal, 10(40), 43-67. [In Persian]
Afsharian, N., & Dortaj, F. (2016). Evaluation of the Factor Structure of “Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire”forIranian students. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 6(23), 23-43. doi: 10.22054/jem.2017.11267.1327. [In Persian]
Ahmadvand, M, (2010). Examining the psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire of motivational strategies for learning in students of Tehran universities. Master's thesis. Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian]
Britt, T. W. (2005). The effects of identity-relevance and task difficulty on task motivation, stress, and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 189–202.
Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2018). The Moderating Effects of Group Work on the Relationship between Motivation and Cognitive Load. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 68-90.
Delavar, A. (2016). Experimental designs in psychology and educational sciences. Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118(1), 111–115.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Mecee, J. L & et.al. (1983). Expectancies values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed). Achievement and achievement motives. (pp.75-138). San Francisco: W. H. freeman.
Feldon, D. F., Callan G., Juth, S. & Jeong, S. (2019). Cognitive Load as Motivational Cost. Educational Psychology Review, http//doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09464-6
Feldon, D. F., Franco, J., Chao, J., Peugh, J., & Maahs-Fladung, C. (2018). Self-efficacy change associated with a cognitive load-based intervention in an undergraduate biology course. Learning and Instruction, 56, 64–72.
Flake, K. J., Barron, K. E., Hullman, C., Mccoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). The forgotten component of expectancy- value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232-244. http//doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002.
Ghodsi, A., Talepasand, S., Rezaei, A., & mohammadifar, M. (2017). The Psychometric Characteristics of Task Cost Scale in High School Students in Qom. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 7(28), 97-120. doi: 10.22054/jem.2017.24215.1595. [In Persian]
Kadivar, P. (2021). Educational psychology (2nd ed.). Tehran: Samt Publications.
Klepsch, M. & Seufert, T. (2020). Understanding instructional design effects by differentiated measurement of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Instructional Science, 48, 45-77. http//doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09502-9.
Klepsch, M., Schmitz, F. & Seufert, T. (2017). Development and Validation of Two Instruments Measuring Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1997.
Moreno, R. (2005). Instructional technology: promise and pitfalls. In L. PytlikZillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Bruning (Eds.), Technology-based education: bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 1–19). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Moreno, R. (2010). Cognitive load theory: more food for thought. Instructional Science, 38, 135–141. http//doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9122-9
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326.
Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problemsolving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434. http//doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. (1991). The motivational strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Plass, J. L. & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Four Ways of Considering Emotion in Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 339-359. http//doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09473-5.
Skulmowski, A. & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: a New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 171–196. http//doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
Spybrook, J. (2008).The relationship among working memory, mathematics anxiety, and mathematics achievement in developmental mathematics courses in community college. A doctor dissertation presented to the faculty of the school of education and instruction department, The University of San Francisco.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177.
Xu, K. M., Koorn, P., de Koning, B., Skuballa, I. T., Lin, L., Henderikx, M., Marsh, H. W., Sweller, J., & Paas, F. (2021). A growth mindset lowers perceived cognitive load and improves learning: Integrating motivation to cognitive load.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1177–1191.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000631
Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2008). Subjective cognitive effort: A model of states, traits, and time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 617–631.
Zahed, S., Dortaj, F., Asadzadeh, H., Kadivar, P., & Farokhi, N. (2021). structure and validation of the Persian version of the Cognitive Load Questionnaire. Journal of cognitive psychology, 9(1), 39-54. [In Persian]
Zahed, S., Karsheki, H., & Roshanghias, P. (in press). The effect of exogenous cognitive load on cognitive engagement and desired cognitive load of students: a favorable effect.
Educational Psychology, 19(70), 180-201.
https://doi.org/10.22054/jep.2023.71445.3759. [In Persian]
Zepeda, C. D., Martin, R. S., & Butler, A. C. (2020). Motivational strategies to engage learners in desirable difficulties. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 464-470. http//doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.08.007
)