Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Educational Technology department, Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran,Iran

2 Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

3 Faculty of tarbiat modares

Abstract

Design thinking in education is "a kind of learner-oriented and creative problem-solving to respond to ambiguous and complex issues of education and propose innovative issues." The benefits of using design thinking in teaching and learning have led to the need to design and validate the design model of design thinking education for technologists and educational designers, which has not been addressed in the researches reviewed, the need to respond to the existing research gap. The aim of the present research is To achieve this goal, the mixed research method was used in a sequential exploratory manner. With the method of qualitative content analysis, selected specialized texts from the systematic review in the period from 1980 to 2021, extracted from related domestic and foreign databases, were studied and analyzed. By identifying the components of design thinking and effective factors in educational design resulting from research findings on the one hand and with the appropriateness of the social constructive approach in design thinking education on the other hand, the proposed model was designed. In the proposed quantitative section, it was validated. For internal validation, the proposed model was sent to educational technology experts for judgment and validation. Findings and data analysis of the questionnaire showed that the proposed model has good internal validity and can be used for educational technology students.

Keywords

Main Subjects

ابوالحسنی، زهرا و دهقانی، مرضیه، جوادی پور، محمد، صالحی، کیوان، محمدحسنی، نسرین. (1400). تحلیلی بر الگوهای تفکر طراحی و شناسایی نقش و ابعاد آن: مرور نظام­مند. فصلنامه نوآوری‌های آموزشی، 20(4)، 4-34. 
افضل نیا، محمدرضا. (1393). تکنولوژی یادگیری. تهران: سمت.
پورمحمدی، مرتضی و نعمتی، اعظم. (1395). لباس‌های هوشمند، از حل مسأله تا تولید دانش. فصلنامه رشد فناوری، 12(47)، 66-76.
تابش،یحیی. (1398). تفکر طراحی، خلاقیت و نوآوری برای همه. تهران: فاطمی.
جاناسن، دیوید اچ، و سوزان. ام. لند. (1395). مبانی نظری محیط‌های یادگیری، ترجمه مینا آذرنوش و حسین زنگنه. تهران: نشر آوای نور.
جهانی، جعفر، قادری، مجتبی، محمدی، مهدی، و شفیعی سروستانی، مریم. (1398). طراحی و اعتباریابی مقیاس ارزیابی توانایی تفکر طراحی در دانشجویان دانشگاه فرهنگیان. فصلنامه آموزش در علوم انتظامی، 6(24)، 211-189.
دلاور، علی. (1389). روش شناسی کیفی. فصلنامه راهبرد، 18(1)، 307-329.
رایسر، رابرت ای، و دمسپی، جان وی. (1400).تکنولوژی و طراحی­آموزشی، روندها و مسائل. ترجمه مرتضی­کرمی و جواد غلامی، تهران: آییژ.
رئیس دانا، فرخ لقا. (1397). از تکنولوژی­آموزشی به تکنولوژی فکر، رشد فناوری­آموزشی، ۲.       
طلیسچی، غلامحسین، ایزدی، عباسعلی، و عینی فر، علیرضا. (1391). پرورش توانایی طراحی طراحان مبتدی معماری طراحی داربست آزمون یک محیط یادگیری سازنده گرا. هنرهای زیبا معماری و شهرسازی، 17(4)، 17-28.
فردانش، هاشم. (1398). مبانی نظری تکنولوژی آموزشی. چاپ نوزدهم. تهران: سمت.
فردانش، هاشم. (1401). طراحی­آموزشی، مبانی، رویکردها وکاربردها. چاپ­ششم. تهران: سمت.
فردانش، هاشم و کرمی، مرتضی. (1387). شناسایی الگوی­طراحی­آموزشی مطلوب برای آموزشهای صنعتی، فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی، 2(8)، 131-106.
فریدی زاد، امیرمسعود. (1395). ابهام زدایی از تفکر طراحی و شاخص‌های آن، مطالعات تطبیقی هنر، 6(11)، 37-25.
فیروزی، زهرا، کرمی، مرتضی، رضوانی، محمود، کارشکی، حسین. (1394). مقایسه اثربخشی مدل­های طراحی آموزشی سازنده­گرا (جاناسن) و سیستمی(مریل) در طراحی­محیط‌های یادگیری مسأله­محور در آموزش ضمن­خدمت معلمان. نظریه و عمل در برنامه درسی، (6)3، 70-53.
کرمی، مرتضی، فردانش، هاشم، عباس پور، عباس، و معلم، مهناز. (1388). مقایسه اثربخشی الگوهای طراحی آموزشی سیستمی و سازنده­گرا در آموزش مدیران. مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی در نظام‌های آموزشی، 2(3)، 30-9.
کیان‌ارثی، منصوره و فرهنگ، مظفر. (1398). مولفه‌های اصلی پرورش تفکرطراحانه در آموزش طراحی معماری. نشریه مرمت و معماری ایران، 9(18)، 18-1.
لاوسون، برایان. (1395). طراحان چه می‌دانند، ترجمه حمید ندیمی، فرهاد شریعت، و فرزانه باقی زاده. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
یایوجه، امراه. (1400). متدولوژی تفکر طراحی. ترجمه سکینه طالبی و ملیحه کوثری. تهران: انتشارات آوای نور.
Abolhasani, Z., Dehghāni, M., Javādipour, M., Sālehi, K., & Mohammadhasani, N. (2021). Analysis of design thinking models and identifying their role and dimensions: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Innovations, 20(4), 7-34. doi: 10.22034/jei.2021.242752.1584 [In Persian]
Aflatoony, L., Wakkary, R., & Neustaedter, C. (2018). Becoming a Design Thinker: Assessing the Learning Process of Students in a Secondary Level Design Thinking Course. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 438–453
Afzal Nia, M. R. (2014). Learning Technology, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32–54.
Beligatamulla, G. (2021). Design thinking pedagogy: A phenomenographic study of design thinking teaching in the higher education context. thesis, Queensland University of Technology. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0
Brown, S. E., Karle, S. T., Kelly, B. (2015). An Evaluation of Applying Blended Practices to Employ Studio-Based Learning in a Large-Enrollment Design Thinking Course. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(4), 260-280. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105646.pdf
Delavar, A. (2008) "Qualitative Methodology", Strategy Quarterly, 18(1), 307-329. [In Persian]
Dym, C. L., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103– 120. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
Fardanesh, H. (1401). Instructional design, basics, approaches and applications. Sixth edition. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
Fardanesh, H. (2018). Theoretical foundations of educational technology. 19th edition, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
Fardanesh, H., & Karami, M. (2007). Identification of the optimal teaching-design model for industrial education, Curriculum Studies Quarterly, (8)2, 131-106. [In Persian]
Faridizad, A. M. (2015). Disambiguation of design thinking and its indicators, Comparative Art Studies, (11)6, 25-37. [In Persian]
Firuzi, Z; Kerami, M., Rizvani, M., Karsheki, H. (2014). "Comparison of the effectiveness of constructivist (Jonassen) and systemic (Merril) instructional design models in the design of problem-oriented learning environments in in-service teacher training". Theory and practice in curriculum, (6)3, 53-70. [In Persian]
Fuente, J., Carbonell, I., and LaPorte, M. (2019).” Design Thinking as a Framework for Teaching Packaging Innovation," Journal of Applied Packaging Research: 11(1), https://scholarworks.rit.edu/japr/vol11/iss1/4
Green, M. (2020). Design thinking for learning (DT4L) Research evaluation is.vic.edu.au›isv-design-thinking-for-learning-research-evaluation-2020 https://is.vic.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/isv-design-thinking-for-learning-research-evaluation-2020.pdf
Hannafin, M.J, Hill, J.R. (2007) Epistemology and the design of learning environment. In: Reiser, RA, Dempsey, JV (Eds) Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology.Columbus, OH:Pearson, 53–61
Henriksena, D., Richardsonb, C. & Mehtab, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice Thinking Skills and Creativity. V. 26. 140-153. www.elsevier.com/locate/tsc
 Jahani, J., Kadri, M., Mohammadi, M. and Sh. Sarostani, M. (2018). "Design and Validation of Design Thinking Ability Assessment Scale in Farhangian University Students", Journal of Education in Law Enforcement Sciences, (24)6. 211-189. [In Persian]
Jonassen, D. H., and M. Land S. (2015). Theoretical foundations of learning environments, translated by M. Azarnoosh and H. Zanganeh, Tehran: Avai Noor Publishing House. [In Persian]
Jonassen, D.H. (2011). Supporting Problem Solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2). doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1256
Karami, M; Fardanesh, H; Abbas Pour A; Moallem, M. (2008). "Comparison of the effectiveness of systematic and constructivist instructional design models in the training of managers". Management and planning in educational systems, (3) 2.30-9. [In Persian]
Kian-Arthi, M. and Farhang, M. (2018) "The main components of cultivating design thinking in teaching architectural design". Journal of restoration and architecture of Iran. (18) 9. 818-1. [In Persian]
Lawson, B, (2015). What designers know, translated by H. Nadimi, F.Shariat, and F. Baghizadeh. Publications of Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian]
Locase, M. (2017). Design Thinking Your Teaching Infographic. Instructional design infographics. http://www.focus2achieve.com/blog/design-thinking-your-teaching
Naghshbandi, S. (2014). Identifying secondary school teachers’ understandings and implementations of design thinking within a design-based research Approach (T). University of British Columbia. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0074396
Naiman, L. (2019).  Design Thinking as a Strategy for Innovation. https:// www.creativityatwork.com/europeanbusinessreview.com/design-thinking-as-a-strategy-for-innovation/
Novak, E. & Mulvey, B. (2020). Enhancing design thinking in instructional technology students. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 1-11. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12470
Panke, S. (2019). Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. journal Open Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022
Pourmohammadi, M. and Nemati, A. (2015). Smart clothes, from problem solving to knowledge generation, Roshd Technology Quarterly, 12 (47). [In Persian]
Rais Dana, F. (2017) "From Educational Technology to Thought Technology", Development of Educational Technology, 2. [In Persian]
Reigeluth, C. Morgan. Carr- C., A. A. (2009). Instructional- Design Theories and Models V.3, Building a Common Knowledge Base, Taylor and Francis, Publishers New York and London.
Reiser, R. A and Dempsey, J. V. (2007). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Reiser, R. E., Dempsey, J. V. (1400). Technology and instructional design, trends and issues. Translated by Morteza K. and Javad Gh., Tehran: Aeeizh. [In Persian]
Richey, Rita C., Klein, James D. & Tracey Monica W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice: Retrieved from: DOI: 10.4324/9780203840986
Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education. Design and Technology Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication /332343908 _Transforming_Constructivist_ Learning_into_ Action_ Design_Thinking_in_ education/ stats
Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., & Whitelock, D. (2014). Innovating pedagogy. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University
Tabesh, Y. (2018). Design thinking, creativity and innovation for everyone, Tehran: Fatemi Publications. [In Persian]
Taheri, M., Unterholzer, T., Hölzle, K. & Meinel, C. (2016). An educational perspective on design thinking learning outcomes. Was presented at The ISPIM Innovation Forum, Boston, MA, USA on 13-16.ISPIM members at www.ispim.org.
Talischi, Gh., Izadi, A., & Ainifar, A. (2013). Developing the design ability of beginner architectural designers to design a test scaffold of a constructivist learning environment. Fine arts of architecture and urban planning. (4) 17-28.17. [In Persian]
Xiehong, F. & Yingjie, G. (2020). The Impact of Design Thinking Workshop on Students’ Design Thinking Traits. Creative Education Studies, 2020, 8(1), 6-1 Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2020.81002
Yayici, A. (1400). Design Thinking methodology. Translated by S. Talebi and M. Kaushari. Tehran: Avai Noor Publishing House (Persian). ISBN-13:978-6058603752. [In persisan]
Zain.I. M. (2017). THE Collaborative Instructional Design System. An Innovative Instructional Design Tool. for 21st Century Learning. Educational Research 5(12). DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.051216--