Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Abstract
Abstract
he aim of the present research was to conduct a comparative investigation of personality traits and learning modes in basic, engineering and human sciences' students of Islamic Azad University in Mazandaran province. The research method is causative - comparative (Ex Post Facto). 300 students of Islamic Azad University in Mazandaran province were randomly selected and personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and Kolb’s learning styles inventory (LSI) were administered to them. In order to analyze the data, ANOVA were used. Results indicated that there are differences among means of NEO factors (extroversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness) and learning modes, (concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, active Experimentation).
Keywords
امان الهی، عباس .(1384). بررسی رابطه ویژگیهای شخصیتی و عوامل فردی- خانوادگی با رضایت زناشویی. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره خانواده، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران.
حسینی لرگانی، مریم .(1377). بررسی رابطه بین سبکهای یادگیری دانشجویان کارشناسی و کارشناسی ارشد زن و مرد قوی و ضعیف سه رشته علوم انسانی، پزشکی و فنی و مهندسی دانشگاههای تهران. پایان نامه منتشره نشده. دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
محمدزاده ادملایی، رجبعلی .(1384). مقایسه دانشجویان دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز دارای سبکهای یادگیری متفاوت از لحاظ ویژگیهای شخصیتی، انگیزه پیشرفت و عملکرد تحصیلی. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.
منابع انگلیسی
Agogino, A. M,. & Hesi, S. (1995). Learning styles based innovations to improve retention of female engineering students in the synthesis coalition. In ASEE/Ieee Frontiers in education .95: Proceeding. Pardue University.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A,. Lewis, M. (2007). Personality and Approaches to Learning Predict Preference for Different Teaching Methods. Learning and Individual Differences, v17 n3 p241-250.
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1985). Comparison of EPT and psychotisism scales with measures of the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences. 6, 587-597.
Donclark, Q. (2000). Learning Styles Or, How We Go From the Unknown To the Known.
http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/learning/styles.html.
Fahy, P. J & Mohamed, A. (2005). Students learning style and asynchronous computer-mediated conference (CMC) interaction. Americanjournal of distance education, c19 n1 p5-22.
Gerard, K & Jill, K. (2006). Closing the Gap: Impact of Student Proactivity and Learning Goal Orientation on E-Learning Outcomes. International Journal on E-Learning, v5 n3 p361-372.
Goldberg, I. (1982). From Ace Zombie: Some exploration in the language of personality. In Speilberger. C. D. & Butcher. J. N. (Eds) Advances in Personality Assessment.
Hartman, V. F. (1995). Teaching and learning styles preferences. Transition through technology VCCA. Journal 9 (2), 18-20.
Homayouni, A., Porahmad, R., Mosavi, S. J., Nikpour, G. A. (2007). The study of relationship among personality dimensions and their role in learning English of distance education students. 10th European Congress of Psychology July 3-6, 2007 Prague, Czech Republic.
Homayouni, A., Kadivar, P. Taghypour, H. (2009). Learning and cognitive styles as effective factors in learning English for EFL students. International Journal of Learning. Vol 16. Chicago university press.
Liebert. R. M. & Spiegler. A. (1998). Personality: Strategies issues Brook/ Cole Publishing Company.
McCrae, R. R,. & Costa, P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision NEO Five Factor Inventory. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 578-596.
Martin, G. (2006). Constructing and maintaining an effective hypertext-based learning environment: Web-based learning and cognitive style. Education and training, v48 n2-3 p143-155.
Nijhuis, J,. Segers, M,. Gijselaers, W. (2007). The Interplay of Perceptions of the Learning Environment, Personality and Learning Strategies: A Study among International Business Studies Students. Studies in Higher Education, v32 n1 p59-77
Wilcoxson, L. (1995). Review And Further study of validity and reliability. University of Sydney. British journal of educational psychology. 66.252-261
)