Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 . Ph.D. Candidate of Motor Behavior, International Campus, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran ; Lecturer, Farhangian University,Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior , Department Of Physical Education & Sport Sciences , Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This study aims at investigating the effect of the type of instructional language on students’ intrinsic motivation and motor learning. Forty-eight female students of Farhangian University were randomly divided into three instructional language groups (autonomy supportive, controlling, and neutral). All groups watched a silent clip about darts throwing. Then, they performed 21 throws (pre-test) and subsequently, each group watched a specific clip prepared for them. The instructions in the second clip were prepared in such a way as to provide identical technical information but manifesting different degrees of choice or control in performing the task. Then, each group performed 51 throws as their post-test. On the second day, all groups performed 21 throws (retention test). All participants completed the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory by McAuley et al. (1991) after the three tests. The results of the repeated measures (ANOVA) showed that the instructional language in the autonomy supportive group facilitated learning significantly through its effect on intrinsic motivation this group.

Keywords

Main Subjects

حجازی دینان، پریسا؛ اصلانخانی، محمدعلی؛ فرخی، احمد و شجاعی، معصومه. (1390). اثر دستورالعمل کانون توجه بر سینماتیک و دقت پرتاب طی یادگیری پرتاب دارت در افراد مبتدی. نشریه رفتار حرکتی و روانشناسی ورزشی،9، 66-45.
دلاور، علی. (1396). مبانی نظری و عملی پژوهش در علوم انسانی و اجتماعی. تهران: انتشارات رشد. چاپ هفدهم.
شایان، ابوالفضل؛ حومنیان، داود؛ عابدینی پاریزی، حسین و فاضل کلخوران، جمال. (1396). اثر تعاملی (الگوی ماهر و الگوی از خود) و نوع بازخورد بر اجرا و یادگیری مهارت پرتاب دارت. نشریه رشد و یادگیری حرکتی، 10، 142-123.
قمری، محمد و جعفری اصغر. (1390). رابطه بین مؤلفه‌های انگیزش درونی و شادی در بین دانش آموزان مقطع متوسطه شهر کرج. نشریه علوم رفتاری،8، 106-93.
قمری، محمد. (1391). رابطه بین سرمایه اجتماعی و انگیزش درونی با پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش آموزان دوره متوسطه شهر کرج. نشریه آموزش و ارزشیابی،22، 58-45.
 
Abe, M., Schambra, H., Wassermann, E. M., Luckenbaugh, D., Schweighofer, N., & Cohen, L. G. (2011). Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains. Current Biology, 21(7), 557-562.
Bernardi, G., Ricciardi, E., Sani, L., Gaglianese, A., Papasogli, A., Ceccarelli, R., ... & Pietrini, P. (2013). How skill expertise shapes the brain functional architecture: an fMRI study of visuo-spatial and motor processing in professional racing-car and naïve drivers. PloS one, 8(10), e77764.
Buckner, R. L. (2012). The serendipitous discovery of the brain's default network. Neuroimage, 62(2), 1137-1145.
Carreira, J. M. (2012). Motivational orienations and psychological needs in EFL learning among elementary school students in Japan. System, 40(2), 191-202.
Chen, D., & Singer, R. N. (1992). Self-regulation and cognitive strategies in sport participation. International Journal of Sport Psychology.
Chen, K. C., & Jang, S. J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741-752.
Collins, A., Eneroth, P., & Landgren, B. M. (1985). Psychoneuroendocrine stress responses and mood as related to the menstrual cycle. Psychosomatic medicine.
De Muynck, G. J., Vansteenkiste, M., Delrue, J., Aelterman, N., Haerens, L., & Soenens, B. (2017). The effects of feedback valence and style on need satisfaction, self-talk, and perseverance among tennis players: An experimental study. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 39(1), 67-80.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Cognitive evaluation theory. In Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (pp. 43-85). Springer, Boston, MA.
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and individual differences, 8(3), 165-183.
Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults' orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of educational Psychology, 73(5), 642.
Hancock, G. R., Butler, M. S., & Fischman, M. G. (1995). On the problem of two-dimensional error scores: Measures and analyses of accuracy, bias, and consistency. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27(3), 241-250.
Hooyman, A., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2014). Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human Movement Science, 36, 190-198.
Kirschbaum, C., Kudielka, B. M., Gaab, J., Schommer, N. C., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1999). Impact of gender, menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Psychosomatic medicine61(2), 154-162.
Leiker, A. M., Bruzi, A. T., Miller, M. W., Nelson, M., Wegman, R., & Lohse, K. R. (2016). The effects of autonomous difficulty selection on engagement, motivation, and learning in a motion-controlled video game task. Human movement science, 49, 326-335.
Leotti, L. A., & Delgado, M. R. (2011). The inherent reward of choice. Psychological science, 22(10), 1310-1318.
Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Grand challenge for movement science and sport psychology: embracing the social-cognitive–affective–motor nature of motor behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 1, 42.
Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2012). 10 Motor learning through a motivational lens. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice, 173.
Lewthwaite, R., Chiviacowsky, S., Drews, R., & Wulf, G. (2015). Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1383-1388.
Liu, D. L. J., Graham, S., & Zorawski, M. (2008). Enhanced selective memory consolidation following post-learning pleasant and aversive arousal. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 89(1), 36-46.
McAuley, E., Wraith, S., & Duncan, T. E. (1991). Self‐Efficacy, Perceptions of Success, and Intrinsic Motivation for Exercise 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 21(2), 139-155.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Cortisol reactivity to a teacher’s motivating style: The biology of being controlled versus supporting autonomy. Motivation and Emotion, 35(1), 63-74.
Sanli, E. A., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 611.
Ste-Marie, D. M., Carter, M. J., Law, B., Vertes, K., & Smith, V. (2016). Self-controlled learning benefits: exploring contributions of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation via path analysis. Journal of sports sciences, 34(17), 1650-1656.
Su, Y. L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 159-188.
Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of school psychology, 44(5), 331-349.
Wulf, G. (2007). Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy, 93(2), 96-101.
Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(5), 1382-1414.
Wulf, G., Iwatsuki, T., Machin, B., Kellogg, J., Copeland, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2018). Lassoing skill through learner choice. Journal of motor behavior, 50(3), 285-292.