Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Abstract
Abstract
ne of the most important needs of human is achievement to perfection, accomplishment and success. Significant part of our country population is related to young people and one of the factors to maintain young people fresh is achievement to success during various stages of life. The present research is performed with the goal of comparative evaluation of success metaphors among top grades, middle grades and who were not accepted in university entrance exam of 2008. Therefore, 150 candidates of university entrance exam of 2008 have been selected (50 top grades, 50 middle grades and 50 unaccepted from 5 test groups). By this, from top grades of 1-20, and from middle grades of 1000-1500 and from who were not accepted as above 30000, the persons have been selected by sampling method. Then, metaphors were evaluated using content analysis method, descriptive type. Therefore, below results have been archived: Top grades noted to individual factors, middle grades noted to individual and environmental factors and who were not accepted noted to environmental factors. Also, among effective factors to the success of these three groups, the external unfavorable conditions were meaningful to who were not accepted and other factors were common among them. As successful and unsuccessful people are defined based on university entrance exam grades, these results are specified to these groups and not generalized to other groups with different success definition and any conclusions should be provided as conservative.
Keywords
انوری، ح. (1381). فرهنگ بزرگ سخن. تهران: انتشارات سخن.
پورافکاری، ن. (1385). فرهنگ جامع روانشناسی و روانپزشکی. تهران: انتشارات فرهنگ معاصر.
حایری، یسرا.(1386). بررسی عوامل مؤثر در موفقیت دانش آموزان در ورود به دانشگاه در رشتههای روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی در سال 86-1385. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
سیف، ع. (1386). روانشناسی پرورشی نوین. تهران: نشر دوران.
سیف، ع. (1379). روانشناسی پرورشی. تهران: انتشارات آگاه.
شولتز، د. (1383). نظریههای شخصیت. ترجمه ی: کریمی و همکاران. تهران: نشر ارسباران (تاریخ انتشار به زبان اصلی، 1990).
قاسم زاده، حبیب الله.( 1379). استعاره و شناخت. تهران : انتشارات فرهنگان.
گلدنبرگ، ا. و گلدنبرگ، ه. (1382). خانواده درمانی. ترجمه: ح. حسین شاهی برواتی و س. نقشبندی. تهران: نشر روان (تاریخ انتشار به زبان اصلی، 2000).
گلمن، د. (1383). هوش هیجانی. ترجمه نسرین پارسا. تهران: انتشارات رشد ( تاریخ انتشار اثر به زبان اصلی، 1995).
لیندگرن، ه. (1372). روانشناسی موفقیت درتحصیلات دانشگاهی. ترجمه: ی. اردبیلی. تهران: انتشارات روزبه.
مرادی، م. (1387). بررسی اثر بخشی فن استعاره فاصلهها به شیوه گروهی بر کاهش تعارضات پدر- دختر و نوجوانان مقطع متوسطه شهر تهران. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
منابع انگلیسی
Ansalone, G., Ming, C. (2006).Programming students for academic success: the PLS an alternative to traditional tracking. Educational research quarterly, 29, (3), 3.
Alfaro, E., Umana-Taylor, A., Gorzales, M., Mayra, B., Katharin, B. (2009). Latino adolescents academic motivation and gender. Journal of academic adolescenc, 32, 941- 962.
Bernold, L., Spurlin, J., Anson, C. (2007).Understanding our students: a longitudinal study of success and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of engineering education, 96, (3), 263.
Brott, P. (2001). The storied approach: A postmodern perspective for career counseling. The career development quarterly, 49, (4), 304.
Bruce, David. (2000).Towards a social architecture of school success: academic microcultures, identity scaffolding and student self-narratives. Requirements for the degree of Doctor of philosophy. University of California at berkeley
Chisnell, Steven.(1993). Language and meaning in the postmodern classroom. English journal.vol.82,lss.8,pg.53
Cooper, D. (1997). Post modernism & contemporary philosophical challenges in world (pp.460-486). Oxford & combridge.USA: Blackwell.
Cross, J., Ambrose, D., Cross,T .(2007). Metaphorical influences on thought and action: helping the gifted escape metaphorical entrapment. Roeper Review, 29,(5), 37.
Descamp, M., sweetser, E. (2005). Metaphors for God: what and How Do our Choices Matter for Human? The Application of Contemporary cognitive Linguistics, Research to the Debate on God and Metaphor . Journal of pastoral Psychology, 53, (3), 45.
Desocio, j. (2005).Accessing self – development through narrative approaches in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing,18, (2), 53-61.
Epston, D., White, M. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New york: Norton.Yalom,l.(1989).Existential psychotherapy.New york: Basic Books
Fabio, A., Busoni, L. (2007). Fluid intelligence, personality traits and scholastic success:Empirical evidence in a sample of Italian high school students. Journal of personality and individual differences, 43, 68-79.
Fabio, A., Palazzeschi, L. (2009). An in-depth look at scholastic success:Fluid intelligence,personality traits or emotional intelligence? Journal of personality and individual differences, 49, 581-585.
Farsides, T., Woodfield, R. (2003). Individual differences and undergraduate academic success:The roles of personality, intelligence and application. Journal of personality and individual differences, 34, 1225-1243.
Firkowska- Mankiewicz, A. (2002). Intelligence and success in life (pp.232), Poland: IFis publishers
Graziano, P., Reavis, R., Keane, S., Calkins, S. (2007). The role of emotion regulation in childrens early academic success. Journal of school psychology, 45, 3 -19.
Griffin, K. (2006). Striving for success: A qualitative exploration of competing theories of high – achieving black college students academic motivation. Journal of college student development, 47,(4), 384.
Gupta,Damyanti.(1990). The linguistic approach: ideas & issues. Jaipur/India: peinter publishers,ch.2,pp.29-63
Hodges, J. (2006). College rules: How to study, survive and success in college. Journal of college student development, 47,(4), 490.
Hsieh, P., Cho, Y., Liu, M., Schallert, D. (2008) .Examining the interplay between middle school students achievement goals and self-efficacy in a technology-enhanced learning environment. American secondary education, 36,(3), 33.
Lakoff, G. Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The university of Chicago press.
Latridis, T. Fousiani, K. (2009).Effects of status and outcome on attributions and just-world beliefs:how the social distribution of success and failure may be rationalized. Journal of experimental social psychology, 45,(415- 420).
Main, K. (2008).Teaching beyond the test:the possibility of success. English journal(high school edition), 97,(5),46.
MCHatton, P., Zalaquett, C. (2006). Achieving success: perceptions of students from migrant farmwork families. American secondary education, 34,(2),25.
Parker, J., Summerfeldt, L., Hogan, M., Majeski, S. (2004). Emotional intelligence and academic success: examining the transition from high school to university .Journal of personality and individual differences, 23,.124-136.
Raley, K., Frisco, M., Wildsmith, E. (2005). Maternal cohabitation and educational success. Sociology of education, 78,(2), 144.
Rouse, D. (2001). Reclaiming the fir: how Successful people overcome Burnout. Education Periodical,97,(19),1209.
Saban, A., kocbeker, B., Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teacher's conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Journal of learning and instruction,17,123-139.
Sanders, A. (2008).Rekindling success. Education periodical,83,(7), 47.
Viadero, D. (2009).Out-of-school factors seen as key, poverty and potential:out-of school factors and school success. Education week, 28,(24),5.
Xu, S., Stevens, D. (2005). Living in stories through images and metaphors: recognizing unity in diversity. Mcgill journal of education,40,(2),303.
yazejian, A., Toews, M., Sevin, T., purswell, K. (2008). “it’s a whole new word” : A qualitative Exploration of college student’s Definitions of and strategies for college success. Journal of college student Development,49,(2),141.
)